Pretty Little Liars

(spoilers)

The mid-season finale of Pretty Little Liars (PLL) just aired over in the US, and by golly it was a good’un.

But that’s no surprise because every single episode is so brilliant. I have honestly not watched a programme where I couldn’t guess what was going to happen at the end of it. PLL is one of those shows that has me hooked, and I’m going to go ahead and say better than Gossip Girl (that’ll no doubt come and bite me in the ass).

For those unfamiliar with it, PLL is a show based on a series of books by author Sara Shepard the first published way back in 2006 and the most recent in July of this year. It’s set in the fictional town of Rosewood, featuring a clique of girls who drift apart after the disappearance of their ‘leader’ Alison. They come together again when an omnipresent character ‘A’ begins to taunt the girls, Hanna, Aria, Emily and Spencer, about all of their secrets. And trouble soon follows.

The show follows the same vein, and in it’s second season has viewers hooked on finding out who ‘A’ really is. There are so many possibilities it makes for some exhilarating television. Each episode ends with a scene whilst the credits are rolling showing you what ‘A’ is doing, half the time I’m sure it’s a guy but then the storyline beckons to ‘A’ being a girl, it’s nowhere near possible to tell!

For the mid season finale it begins where it will end showing three of the girls in a police holding room after being caught, what it appears, red-handed (or dirt-handed if you so will). The drama builds as we return to the previous hours leading upto the girls’ incarceration. We see the girls each receive a doll with instructions on what they should do if they wish to see their therapist Dr Sullivan alive again, as in the previous episode ‘A’ led them to believe the doctor was dead or at least heading that way with a text stating “the doctor is out – A”.

But as Spencer points out it’s a genius plan, each of the tasks the girls must complete are their deepest darkest desires, although no reason appears as to why Spencer really wants to end her relationship with Toby… Aria must get rid of her teacher-boyfriend’s stalky ex Jacqui, Hanna must ruin her Dad’s wedding even though she has only just rekindled their relationship and Emily, well she doesn’t get anything. Yet.

It seems simple enough for Aria and Spencer to carry out their tasks, and a teeny bit awkward for Hanna who halts the wedding mid-ceremony. Emily’s task meanwhile has surfaced, as she was driving to the ceremony her satnav starts to play up, noticing the doll on her backseat it claims it will take Emily “to her”. Who are we thinking? Logically the doctor, deep down, Alison… We see Emily turn up at a barn with a car running inside, and you immediately sense the danger she’s in after the barn door closes shut but does she take her STILETTO heel off her foot and smash the window to turn off the engine? No she does nothing of the sort, she passes out and just when you she’s going to be the next victim she gets dragged out by ‘A’.

Now this is the part that I think has a reveal in it and probably always has (in the title song), it’s a bit Harry Potter-ish too. As Emily is passed out, well we’re led to believe she is anyway, she sees Alison who tells Emily she always favoured her blah blah and when Emily asks if she knows who ‘A’ is Alison’s reply is “two can only keep a secret if one of them is dead”. So tell me if I’m reading into this too much or in the wrong manner but is Alison saying she isn’t dead but someone else is, and that’s how she is keeping the “secret” or is she still dead and the other person that is actually ‘A’ the person who killed Alison… I’m confusing myself.

Meanwhile the girls have completed their missions and have received an address, the same address where Emily is and find her and wake her up. A shovel is leant against the barn along with a note that says “You will need this” along with some coordinates that must be the location of Dr Sullivan. Only it isn’t, it’s a trap, the girls were set up by ‘A’ and cornered by the police with their hands on the shovel that is revealed to be the weapon that killed Alison. If we go back to about episode eight where Spencer finds (oh so easily) Alison’s postmortem report we see that page five was missing, and noone knows what’s on it but duh-du-duuhhh Jenna and Garrett do.

What’s that you say? Jenna and Garrett are the ones behind this. Oh, yeah I knew that all along, she hates them for making her blind of course it’s them that set the girls up and got them arrested. But wait no that’s way too easy. I reckon they’re acting alone on this part, they were there on the night of Alison’s murder and tried to set Jason up but they didn’t kill her they just moved the body… that’s why they wanted page five’s trace evidence reports destroyed so noone would think it’s them and no way have they been keeping tabs on the girls’ all this time they’re not THE ‘A’ just one of many. **

I mean how does the return of Detective Wilden fit back into this, as Spencer’s Mum points out he has some strong evidence against them, something apart from the shovel? Either that or he’s another NAT member and helped out Garrett and Jenna, maybe that’s what Garrett refers to when he says “this will get you a promotion”… And as another thought on Garrett, he says that Jason’s worked out that he didn’t kill Alison but that he doesn’t know they wrote the note. He doesn’t actually say anything about the killing. (But then again if Garrett waited months to get into the storage room, I’m assuming it was for the shovel, so the police already had it as evidence because Det Wilden even says “We’ve known all along what the murder weapon was”, so they had it and haven’t realised it was taken out of the evidence storage room and the girls were using it? Huh?)

The fact that the usual ‘A’ scene rolls at the credits tells us that Garrett and Jenna can’t be the only ‘A’, when ‘A’ has Dr Sullivan at some sort of roadside diner and the doctor replies with “I’ve done what you asked me to do” and then receives an envelope from ‘A’. At first it seems like money, but Dr Sullivan surely wouldn’t be motivated to do something for money in return, and ‘A’ so easily lets her go she must have something substantial on her that would warrant Dr Sullivan to lie about where she was to the girls and for her not to return to tell them what she had found out.

And then comes the killer hook, as the waitress comes over to fill ‘A’s coffee cup she comments: “How you doing tonight pretty eyes?”. Now if I’m going to read right into this, the way the waitress speaks to ‘A’ it has to be someone younger than herself and it has to be a girl. What person would say that to a guy? Hmm. But then it goes back to the books because if you like to spoil yourself and want answers ahead of the game they state that Mona is the first ‘A’, it fits, but like Marlene King show executive says more than one ‘A’ is a “plausible theory“.

 

** I’ve just realised Jenna says “she deserved to die like that” which kind of implicates them in Alison’s death…

Mini, midi or maxi?

I saw Style Souk tweet this question the other day with a link to an article from the Telegraph fashion section and wondered what I would really answer to this question?

I’ve owned mini skirts but not really in stylish sense that are so popular right now, the staple denim mini and a couple of other ones that I probably wouldn’t wear again are in my wardrobe but I don’t think I would go out to purchase a mini skirt right now. I’d rather by a short dress…

The problem I have with midi skirts is odd. I like the style, shape, patterns they come in and can’t believe how good they look when I see them on the pages of fashion mags. However, now every time I’m in my home town (which is choc-a-bloc with OAP’s) I can’t help think how stylish they look. WHAT? Yes that is correct, the midi is the summer style staple of grannies up and down the country Everywhere you turn there’s a sliver of calf and then a swoosh of midi. Brights, floral, stripes, and chiffon any look you can think of. So then I get the urge to go to a granny store see what treasures I can dig up but my brain tells me this is not a good idea hence the midi also not been a good idea. I know there are ways to ‘sex’ up the look but for now I cannot get my head around the granny favourite.

So it’s the maxi that’s the winner for me, floaty or tight, and easy to wear. I have a nude chiffon one with a mini skirt underneath so I guess it’s a mixture but perfect to dress up or dress down especially for the summer months. I have a black fitted jersey one that is a casual alternative and a few maxi dresses to add on top of that. WINNER.

I think if I were to sample the midi style it would be the pencil, the new styles around this season are fitted, tailored, casual, glam, leather and lace, a shed load of choice maybe I’ll dip in and try one out…

PU leather pencil rib side skirt £36 // Jersey pencil skirt £25 // PU waistband pencil skirt £30 all Topshop

Herome Nail Hardener

I’m lucky enough to have nails that look long even when in fact they are super short, so I’ve always just cut them whenever they get  a bit of growth on them to keep in with the short square nail trend. But that’s all a-changing, long oval nails are the trend du jour and I thought I’d give it a go after seeing so many cool designs on Sophy Robson’s site and on the catwalks.

What my main problem is, and I don’t know whether it’s down to diet, weak nails or from always wearing nail varnish, but my nails always split. It’s really frustrating because just when I think my nails are looking ok, bam, that annoying bubble pops up at the end of my nail and ruins the whole look because I just cannot resist picking it off.

So I take to the internet trawling through sites to see what anybody recommends in terms of strengthening nails. Bog searches are so much better for this kind of thing because people like to help, they tell you what they have used and whether they liked it and it seems more reliable than hunting down a brand website who of course are going to recommend their product whether it’s rubbish or not.

Back to nail extraordinaire Sophy Robson, who’s work has just featured on the cover of Vogue Espana September issue on the likes of none other than Eva, Helena and Claudia, she recommends using Herome Nail Hardener and who’s to ignore a professional? So there I go hunting down where I can purchase this bottle of pearlescent fluid and would you believe (the names a dead giveaway) that it’s French and only available in France. Great. But lo and behold eBay tends to my needs and a lovely seller promises to dispatch my delivery within 7 days which is not a long time at all (it comes within 3) although it doesn’t come cheap at £11.30 with a delivery charge of £6.98 EEK. But I want strong nails I tell myself.

Herome Nail Hardener (strong) all the way from Francais!

Reading the instructions it documents the treatment you should adhere to that promises strong hard nails within two weeks! (Woah that must be some sort of miracle cure for weak nails, how come I haven’t heard of this before?) Anyway I abruptly laquer it on, you must apply one coat and then the next day apply a second and the third take it off and start again. This is probably the most labourous part of the treatment because it’s all well and nice applying two thick coats giving you a nice sheeny basecoat it’s an absolute bugger to take off and I went through plenty of nail varnish over the two weeks.

I don’t know what I was really expecting, for the varnish to soak into my nails and stop them from splitting yes, but really all it did was protect my nails while they grew but still split. So inbetween times of taking off the varnish I filed and shaped my nails to try and keep splitting to a minimum. It also advises you to get rid of your cuticles, and the more I wish I had because it seems to dry them out and leave them looking a bit messy.

The instructions also mentioned that you can only do this treatment a maximum of TWO times a year. Huh? It says the ingredients are quite strong and that it is recommended to do the two week treatment often but you can use it as a base coat when you paint your nails regularly. Does that not defeat the object because I don’t know about anyone else but I paint my nails about 5 times in a fortnight period so would be continually putting the product on. Plus by the time you have finished the two week treatment half the bottle has disappeared!

I think overall this is a good product to use as a basecoat, but the two week intensive treatment is not worth using up half a bottle on. It seems like it needs to be used over a period of time as your nail is growing with occasional breaks from the chemicals in it. As I’m still growing my nails I will give an update of whether they have strengthened because it seems only fair to Herome to give it a good try!

For now I have returned to my colourful manicures, with an added touch of matte, a nail trend that has popped up on the radar at Chanel and on Sophy’s blog. I bought Rimmel’s matte top coat and am very impressed with the result especially when it’s only £4.59 a bottle!

Barry M's Peach Melba with the matte top coat, you can just about tell that it's not shiny (excuse the chipped nail)

Cosmopolitan Blog Awards 2011

I never enter anything on the belief I will never win, but why not give it a try I have nothing to lose!

So to my lovely readers I would appreciate a nomination from you in the Cosmo Blog Awards 2011,  you can nominate me for what you like either Established Fashion Blog (older than 18 months) or Celebrity as these are the categories my blog seems to fall under!

I might post delicious pictures of half-naked celebrities to entice your vote, or bribe you with my baking. Either way I would love a vote, and I will be nominating my favourites as well!

Kristen Stewart for W Magazine

Who is this? Who is she? What has happened to the lank hair, skinny jeans, t-shirt and Converse pumps that has so become Kristen Stewart’s uniform? She has been given an almighty makeover for the September issue of W Magazine, the credit goes to stylist Edward Enninful and to the famed duo Mert Alas and Marcus Piggott. They are so amazing at what they do, that it had to be the photographers that captured the raw beauty that KStew has deep down (deep deep deep down) below. I say I’m not a fan of Kristen because she always seems so unwilling to be a celebrity, this is what she is now and it seems like she is finally coming around to it despite the occasional moody stare.

But these images from W Magazine and the video interview that goes with it, have started to break down the wall of hatred that I built up when KStew stole my beloved RPattz. She looks gorgeous, and I kind of wish that’s how she would style herself when doing red carpet. I can all but wish, I think those Converse are going to be around for a little while longer…

All images from W Magazine, photographs by Mert Alas and Marcus Piggot

That Gucci dress....again

This is similar to the GQ shoot RPattz did a couple of years ago...

Ahh there's the KStew we all know and love...

Fab.U.Lous.